The Role of Passiveness of Women in Frankenstein In the nineteenth century, women were only seen to be inferior to men; they were only susceptive of being a caretakers due to gender roles. Throughout this time, women were also seen as being unequal to men since they carried more physical strength. Mary Wollstonecraft believed women and men should have the equality of education. Since Frankenstein was published in this century, Mary Shelley has depicted every female character in the novel to have a common trait of passiveness. Frankenstein by Mary Shelley is a horrific novel that avoids strong and independent female leads.
‘Never stupid to ask questions’: Rare Raymond Chandler essay gives writing, office tips
Military OneSource Member Connect
In The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald the reader watches as Daisy Buchanan evolves in love, confidence in herself and finally we see her facade drop away. In the beginning, Daisy is a very quiet, submissive women and as the book moves forward so does Daisy. She begins to live her life without her husband, something she has never done. Daisy always has thought more about what people think about her, rather than what would be best for her and above all her daughter.
Over time, the presence of patriarchal ideologies in the Western world has lessened drastically. Yet in the past, women have lived in brutal societal conditions that most people, especially men, cannot imagine. In Frankenstein , Caroline Frankenstein portrays the ideal female character that works to support her father who has fallen ill and nurses him until his death. This exhibits the attributes associated with patriarchal domesticity because she is nurturing and self-sacrificing, as Caroline puts the needs of her father before her own.
Although these statements maybe risible it carries an important message that has dated back for centuries. Throughout many years the world has been unified socially with one similarity: the culture of a patriarchal society. A patriarchal society is a social society in which males are the primary figures of authority, owning property, and occupying political leadership.
My only feedback for the course for further improvement would be that the assignments submitted should once also be reviewed by the faculty since many students require personal attention and honest guidance on how to improvise their writing skills.
The nuances of words are particularly important when dealing with matters of style, and I struggled through the exercises, which I found a bit more abstract than those in preceding courses of this series.